What are the factual matters that would be relevant for consequentialist arguments regarding sexual behavior?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached or further references and context, we can comment on the following.

The factual matters that would be relevant for consequentialist arguments regarding sexual behavior are the true motives people have to behave in one type of behavior or the other.

In Ethics, consequentialists arguments require that people are aware of the consequences of their decisions and actions. So they have to be on the moral ground to justify the behaviors to consider them valid.

Due to the fact that sexual behavior is so personal to each individual, people should have total awareness of the motives they have to express one sexual conduct or the other.

It could be a lack of proper education, family traumas, personal tastes or dislikes, social agreement, sexual exploration, or simple curiosity. The thing here is that each individual can consider to express a particular behavior but respecting other people's preferences.

"harry t. moore (1905-1951) – civil rights activist, leader, and the first martyr of the civil rights movement. fannie lou hamer (1917–1977) – leader in the american civil rights movement; co-founder of the national women's political caucus and freedom democratic party. james farmer (1920–1999) – congress of racial equality."