Just wanna hang and make new friends

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Me asap worth brainlieist and 50 points

Which of the following correctly describes a repurchase agreement? the sale of a security with a commitment to repurchase the same security at a specified future date and a designated price. the sale of a security with a commitment to repurchase the same security at a future date left unspecified, at a designated price. the purchase of a security with a commitment to purchase more of the same security at a specified future date.