When a person is guilty, they havea. made a charge of wrongdoing. b. been authorized to hear and decide cases in a court of law. c. committed a crime, violation, or wrong, against moral or penal law.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

During he 1840s, more americans than british settled in the oregon country. how do you think this settlement influenced negotiations with the british over the territory

Your competitor is called create your own yogurt, and it uses artificial flavors that customers use to create their own yogurt. in the lesson, you learned about three techniques businesses can use to compete with one another. in two to three sentences, explain how you will address each area of competition to make your business successful against this competitor.