Compare between literate and illeterate individuals in four points

There is a huge difference between an educated human and a literate :

Literate : is a person who is able to read and write.

Educated : is a person who has received education(which is a process of acquisition of knowledge)

Above was the literal and dictionary meaning of the both.The difference could be understood by an example:

A thief has a knowledge to how to use a gun. He doesn't have an education to know how to, why to and when to shoot. Because of the lack of education(in this case it is proper knowledge of use of the gun and its future impact on his life and society), he uses it for his own selfish motives.

Now, an army man receives a proper eduction to handle a gun. He has the education of what impact it will have on a single life, his own life and the whole society. The army man is responsible for each and every bullet he fires.

This also goes with the fact that why sex education is made compulsory in schools. Nowadays every teenager has an access to knowledge of sex by movies, internet and other mediums what they lack is a proper education. Lack of sex education has claimed many innocent young lives in the past,that is why it was made compulsory.

This is the reason why right to education has been recognised as a human right in our constitution.

Therefore, knowing something, is being literate but knowledge of how to use it, when to use and what impact will it cause on human lives at large is education.

Summing it up, the proper usage of anything in a constructive way for the welfare of humanity and all the other living and non - living things, is called education.

Hope you find the answer satisfying

Explanation:

plz mark me as brainiest

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

marginal cost is a microeconomic measure that us to evaluate the extent to which the level of production of a good is sustainable in accounting, that is, to how many quantities the company plans to profit from the production of the good.

the concept of marginal cost is simple, it means the cost of producing one more item. for example, in the case of pies, the marginal cost is the cost of producing one more pie than those that have already been produced.

it is important to understand that productive activity influences marginal cost. the marginal cost of some goods can be very high, while others may be insignificant. for example, the marginal cost of producing an extra plane is very high. already the marginal cost of a water company to provide 1l more water is derisory.

in the case of pies, the cost involves the inputs, the labor and the fixed cost, which involves the fixed space of the bakery. the level of production initially has the marginal cost decreasing because there is space and manpower available. however, to produce more you have to hire more workers and buy more inputs. if physical space is limited, workers will conflict with places, inputs and their productivity will decrease, meaning there is an optimum point of production for each level of space and manpower. from this point on, the productivity of the workers will be getting smaller because of lack of space, so that the marginal cost of producing one more pie will be increasing. so, although you have not posted the chart, but if you have the answer, you can see that my explanation goes according to the marginal cost curve that will increase from the 4th pie, answer (c).