Why were the Georgia colonists content/happy with the Proclamation of 1763, while other colonies protested and were against it? Question 8 options:

The Proclamation of 1763 was not applied to Georgia by the British government so there was no need to be angry or disappointed.

Georgia actually gained land and resources from the Proclamation of 1763, so they were pleased by future opportunities.

The new land and resources gained as a result of the French and Indian War was located south of the Proclamation line so Georgia was not impacted by the law.

Georgia colonists were told that they are not allowed to claim land near the Canadian border.

Compare and contrast the methods of argument that pertelote and chanticleer use to defend their interpretation of dreams. what is false about each of their arguments?

The social contact theory states that

How is the city of savannah related to the union strategy of a full blockade of confederate ports? a) savannah was the last port needed to be secured in order to totally blockade the coast of georgia. b) savannah was the least significant city in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing atlanta and capturing the tennessee river. c) savannah was the least significant city in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing atlanta and capturing the chattahoochee river. d) savannah was the most significant port in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing bases at savannah and the outlying islands to fully blockade georgia.