Social studies! A. Frequent invasion by neighboring civilizations. B. Decreased observance of traditional religions. C. Poor trade and economic decisions. D. Unclear lines of imperial succession

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

This chart shows the number of soldiers killed according to two different sources. source a is a book written by university professors. source b is from a well-known historical website. in a paragraph, explain why the data presented is different, and evaluate the reliability of each source. which should be used in a school research project, and why?

Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.