"THUS, I TELL MYSELF THAT IT COULD NOT BE OTHERWISE THAN THAT FROM SUCH A STATE OF AFFAIRS SHOULD ARISE AN
ANTAGONISM BETWEEN MEXICANS AND FOREIGNERS WHICH IS
NOT THE LEAST OF THE SMOLDERING FIRES WHICH I HAVE
DISCOVERED. THEREFORE, I AM WARNING YOU TO TAKE TIMELY
MEASURES. TEXAS COULD THROW THE WHOLE NATION INTO
REVOLUTION.- MANUEL MIERY TERAN What law was a result of this
statement?

you probably know the answer. stop asking stupid questions and making me waste my time. j.k. ; )   b.t.w. what are three ratios equivalent to 5 : 11? thx

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; limbic system;

answer; attention;