Social Studies
Social Studies, 27.10.2020 23:20, creeconnell1

2 4
5
TIME REMAINING
37:53
How do democratic and totalitarian governments differ in their handling of military affairs?
Democratic countries usually do not maintain large armies, whereas such forces are essential to totalitarian
governments
O Military leaders are popularly elected in totalitarian countries, while in democratic countries they are appointed
by civilian leaders.
O Elected governments control militaries in democratic countries, while in totalitarian countries, they are
dominated by the leader
In totalitarian countries, the public must vote to approve a declaration of war, but presidents in democratic
countries may independently decide to go to war
Marathis and return
Save and Exit
ST

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:10, jalst6084
Carefully study the chart above. which of the following statements best describes literacy rates in north africa? a. literacy rates are decreasing in the region. b. literacy rates are increasing in the region, and the gap between men and women is decreasing. c. literacy rates are increasing in the region, but the gap between men and women is staying the same. d. literacy rates are staying about the same in the region.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:20, lee9724
22. the effect of threshold braking is to a. cause skids. b. lock wheels. c. prevent locking of wheels. d. increase stopping distance.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30, 2alshawe201
Which action best represents the policy of appeasement followed by britain and france prior to the start of world war ii? (a)allowing hitler to annex the sudetenland as part of the munich agreement (b)signing the nazi-soviet pact binding hitler and stalin to peaceful relations (c)sending troops to fight with the liberals during the spanish civil war (d)forbidding the sale of arms to any nation at war
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50, adjjones2011
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
2 4
5
TIME REMAINING
37:53
How do democratic and totalitarian governments d...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 18.12.2020 01:00
Konu
Mathematics, 18.12.2020 01:00
Konu
World Languages, 18.12.2020 01:00
Konu
Spanish, 18.12.2020 01:00