If you were a loyalist who heard what happened at the Battle of Kettle Creek, would you think twice about joining the war effort?

Yes, because I would realize that the British army has no means to protect me as a Loyalist.

Explanation:

Although at first glance, this was a battle of small intensity, it proves that British army didn't had means or even will to help the Loyalist, especially in Georgia. After the battle of Saratoga, and French aid, Patriots turn the tide. That is why as a Loyalist not only that I would think twice after Battle of Kettle Creek, but I would support general Washington's army.

i think it is the third one.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals