I need help with these questions all three please help ASAP will give 30 points and brainliest

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Brainliest will be given is conflict unavoidable among israel and its arab neighbors? why or why not? could stronger economic ties between israel and its arab neighbors reduce conflict? why or why not? what evidence supports your positions?

On this map, the state of georgia is in which section of the map?