Can any one pls send these question answers

1. democratic, because without the voice of the people, the government has no legitimacy. People give consent to the government to rule through their elected leaders, not allowing them to remove this consent or renew it is undemocratic. But, in this case, the people have a voice through their new leaders and have a chance to renew the social contract.

2.  undemocratic, it is in the first ammendment that there is freedom of speech, AND freedom of press. When people are not able to educate themselves about the world around them, they aren't able to participate in government and know the truth about it.

3. undemocratic, every single person over the voting age or requirements needs the right to vote. not every single person has the chance to become "educated" enough to vote in this situation. It is unfair to strip their voice away and take away this basic right you are given. Without this right there is little other way to communicate directly with all the levels of government.

4. undemocratic, freedom of speech is allowed in the first ammendment, so that the government is able to hear the voices of it's people. people give the government the power to rule, and not allowing them to critize it can become dangerous when it comes to the government ignoring the people's needs and it can become too powerful.

Explanation:

hope this helped!

answer; ///(positive correlation);

the secretary of state, appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the senate, is the president's chief foreign affairs adviser. the secretary carries out the president's foreign policies through the state department and the foreign service of the united states.