Schuman begins with a pretty big claim that is, of course, impossible to prove 100%. What does this tell you about who Schuman intends for her audience

Schuman intends to lubricate and distract his audience, so that they end up believing everything he says.

Explanation:

Arguments must be exposed in a direct, specific, simple, succinct and completely subject to proof. An argument that has these characteristics is formulated by a person who does not intend to deceive his audience, nor to force the public to, by convention, believe everything that has been said.

Schuman's argument has none of these characteristics and is issued to compromise the public's reasoning, distracting and forcing them to believe Schuman's information, without anyone being concerned with the veracity of the words.

explanation:

actually, not all representation was acceptable based on this little piece of article, in 1776, the second continental congress issued the declaration of independence, stating their specific grievances with the british monarchy and why they were going to create a separate government. after the colonies separated from the british monarchy and formed the united states of america, they had to answer some crucial questions: 1) if not a monarchy, what type of government was the united states going to have? 2) what kind of government was going to protect the people without violating their individual liberties?