Social Studies
Social Studies, 12.08.2020 04:01, lmolmlm5420

Kiandra and her mother have always had great communication. When Kiandra is upset about anything she can talk to her mother about it without yelling or getting angry. Her mother will listen while Kiandra tells her what she wants without being disrespectful. Kiandra and her mother demonstrate communication.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30, lorilhuff8197
Isaiah is a citizen of florida. he would like to propose a new amendment to his state's constitution to be voted on in the next election. is isaiah able to do this? no. the u. s. and florida constitutions do not allow citizens to add amendments to the state or federal ballot. no. the florida constitution says citizens may only propose new laws or amendments at local government meetings. yes. the florida and u. s. constitutions allow citizens to add amendments to be voted on in the next federal election. yes. the florida constitution allows citizens to propose amendments to the state constitution to be voted on in the next state election.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, chase1869
True or false? correlations can only be negative.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, jacquelineS4232
In 1917 ww1 started to happen, and america tried to stay neutral but couldn't. what are the two main reasons america didn't stay neutral during ww1
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Kiandra and her mother have always had great communication. When Kiandra is upset about anything she...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 20.07.2019 12:00