Another problem for Libertarianism and a possible solution to that problem that we've covered:
If a free will means being able to do what you want while all else stays the same,
then how can we make sense of someone doing otherwise than what their
beliefs and desires make sense for them to do? Perhaps what it means to be free
is to assign weight to possible beliefs and desires; it is the assigning of weight
that is the free choice.
If a free will means being able to have done otherwise while all else stays the
same, then how can we make sense of someone doing otherwise than what their
beliefs and desires make sense for them to do? Perhaps we should just say that
people can choose to be irrational,
If a free will means being able to have done otherwise than one did while all else
stays the same, then how can we make sense of someone doing otherwise than
what their beliefs and desires make sense for them to do? Perhaps what it
means to be free is to assign weight to possible beliefs and desires: it is the
assigning of weight that is the free choice.
None of the above.