Social Studies, 23.07.2020 18:01, katiebug197

Officials of the Youth Hockey League and parents of players in the league have become concerned with the number of flagrant fouls occurring during league games. This past season, the number of flagrant fouls was double the number from the season before. League officials plan to reduce the number of such fouls during the coming season by implementing mandatory suspensions for players who commit flagrant fouls. Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the officials’ plan will be effective?
(A) Most serious injuries occurring during league games are a direct result of flagrant fouls.
(B) League referees have been trained to recognize flagrant fouls and to report incidents involving such fouls.
(C) Parents of players in the league are in support of mandatory suspensions for flagrant fouls.
(D) A similar league suspends players for committing flagrant fouls; this league has a relatively low incidence of flagrant fouls when compared with the Youth Hockey League.
(E) Most players in the league strive to be selected for the All-Star team, and league rules state that no player with a record of suspension shall be selected for the All-Star team.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40, naomihiggins8783

Which nims command and coordination structures are offsite locations where staff from multiple agencies come together?

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30, gudon986732

Give an example of a situation in which an individual's pursuit of economic self-interest may not benefit but instead harm the rest of society

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10, moncho6222

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, raymondanthony3314

Explain what commentary austen is making about social conversation based on this excerpt. your answer should be at least 150 words.

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Officials of the Youth Hockey League and parents of players in the league have become concerned with...