Shamar has decided to study whether early childhood poverty causes lower well-being in adulthood. When he finds evidence supporting the hypothesized relationship, a colleague suggests that before he makes a causal claim, he needs to consider factors that came after early childhood and before adulthood. The colleague is making sure the researcher is meeting which condition of causal inferences?

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

Are people more motivated to change from positive or negative experiences, like slavery, womens rights, and any other historical movements/moments? i need more factual information than opinions.

What happens after a star goes supernova? just wondering! [tex]supernova [/tex] answer asap i really wanna know!