great deal of the suffering that people experience and much of man's inhumanity to man are explained by this description of the fall of human nature. Is this characterization of human nature accurate

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question does not provide any further context or other references, we can say the following.

We are talking about the Christian perspective about the Creation Story that is included in the Old Testament of the Bible. More specifically, in Genesis, 1-3.

This is the description of the Genesis. A great deal of the suffering that people experience and much of man's inhumanity to man are explained by this description of the fall of human nature. But this characterization of human nature accurate is not accurate. It was for many years but not today.

The passage of the Bible assumes that humans born with original sin. That is why humans need to be baptized. But other valid and interesting conceptions affirm that on a contrary perspective, humans are divine, never tarnished by any original sin. That old conception was created to oppress humanity, control it, and humans think that they had to give their power away to churches and priests.

the most likely outcome of fewer loon territories is that hawks would increase in proportion because the benefit of victory would be greater. hawks and loons are natural rivals of resources and victories in the game, since the lakes drying up affected the loons, the hawks would be benefited from the drought.

a.. a conflict between her competing identities.. apex