Social Studies, 14.07.2020 14:01, NeriyahY

For prior restraint to apply, what must the government prove about the speech in question? The speech must be libelous. The speech must present a general threat. The speech must present a clear and identifiable danger. The speech must be offensive.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Government, if it wants to prove any prior restraint to be applied the speech that the government declares is presented in a clear and identifiable danger. So, the correct option is C.

The restrictions that a government wants to apply can be portrayed to the general public in very clear and identifiable manner that a threat is really a concerned matter.

For example if there is a demonetization in the country to curb the rate of corruption in the nation, the speech by the supreme leader of the country must clearly state that govt. considers it as threat.Such threat of corruption should be conveyed to public in simple terms that explains that corruptions can lead to downfall in the economy. Another example is of a pandemic that has hit the country.If there is a need to instate lockdown in the country to avoid virus outbreak, the speech has to be clearly indicative of threats and deaths that can take place due to such virus.

Hence, the correct option is C that the speech of the government has to be clearly identifying the danger about prior restraint that has to be applied for control of situations.

To know more about government speech, click the link below.

link

answered: Jacobstoltzfus

- The speech must present a clear and identifiable danger.

Explanation:

'Prior restraint' is characterized as the government's authority to suppress or prohibit the forms of expression like speech, writing, art, media prior to being published or broadcasted if it poses a threat to national security or community.

The First Amendment of the United States constitution provides this liability to the government to impose censorship or judicially suppress the forms of expression like speech is evaluated or restricted before it is presented in order to give priority to national security and safety of the citizens of the country.

In reference to the above definition, the government is liable to prove the speech in question only when 'the speech offers a clear and identifiable danger to national security, community, or citizens.'

answered: Guest

answer; validity;

answered: Guest

Field of experience occurs when our perconceived notions interfere with our ability to understand the message

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:50, neellllllss

Alimitation on the president’s power to appoint ambassadors is that

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:10, kayladianemmp6qhfa

The us economy received all of the following benefits as a result of technological advancements during industrialization except a. increased production b. reduced costs of consumer goods c. increased farm employment d. the invention of new products

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00, aaliyahrice02

Initially what happened to marigold litton after each test session

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:30, michaelgibsonsto

Which of the following statements best describes the terms of the treaty of guadalupe-hidalgo? a the treaty ended the mexican-american war, resulting in the u. s. finally being able to finish building railroads in texas. b the treaty ended the mexican-american war, resulting in mexico and the u. s. going back to their pre-war conditions. c the treaty ended the mexican-american war, resulting in the u. s. facing a lot of international backlash for the war. d this treaty ended the mexican-american war, resulting in mexico ceding a large amount of land to the united states.

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

For prior restraint to apply, what must the government prove about the speech in question? The speec...