Social Studies
Social Studies, 07.07.2020 18:01, alexandria3498

Elder Abuse Training Post Test 00:10 Question 1 of 22 Persons convicted of elder abuse in Nevada could serve up to 20 years in prison. TRUE FALSE Question 2 of 22 An older person is defined by Nevada law as a person who is 50 years or older. TRUE FALSE Question 3 of 22 Nevada law defines four categories of elder abuse: Abuse, Neglect, (including self neglect), Exploitation, Isolation. TRUE FALSE Question 4 of 22 Signs of abuse in the elderly include: Inadequately explained bruises Fear of speaking for oneself in the presence of the caretaker Sudden change in financial activity All of the Above Question 5 of 22 Psychological Abuse includes: hitting, biting, burning, punching and kicking. TRUE FALSE Question 6 of 22 Sexual Abuse must be reported to: Elder Protective Services Law Enforcement Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance All of the Above Question 7 of 22 Neglect is the failure of a person who has assumed responsibility for caring for an older person to provide

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00, misspicafunpoke
When france sneezes, europe catches cold. what did prince metternich mean by this statement? people in france are more likely to get sick than people elsewhere. europeans elsewhere are often inspired by events in france. happenings in france rarely spread across borders. all damaging incidents in europe start in france.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30, texaslady36
Lots of points: economics: a benefit, such as health insurance, paid vacation, or a retirement plan, that is received by an employee in addition to regular pay is known as a. a fringe benefit b. a pension c. a grievance d. workers’ compensation
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00, jwbri
Why does the supreme court only listen to a small percentage of cases every year?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Elder Abuse Training Post Test 00:10 Question 1 of 22 Persons convicted of elder abuse in Nevada cou...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 07.01.2021 21:30