for the united states, support for human rights often been closely tied to support for A. democratic reforms B. the united nations C. military allies D. U. S. ecomonic interests

A. Democratic reforms.

Explanation:

Human rights has always been tied to the democratic party, so this answer just makes the most sense to me.

The other answers don't make sense because while the UN is connected to human rights, the sentence doesn't check out for it. Supporting human rights does help the UN, but it doesn't really support it. Military allies also makes sense, but again, human rights doesn't support them. The U.S. economic interests doesn't make sense either, because human rights, while needed, are often expensive for the government, which is why they won't do much.

this headline suggests that midterm congressional   elections are at the corner and trump administration wants to activate his base by vowing to clamp down on immigrants and immigration as trump had said during his election campaign around two years ago. when a baby is born in usa, the baby becomes citizen of usa for 85 years and trump wants to end this rule of birthright citizenship to control illegal immigration and this what he said in an interview""we’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” "

answer; foreign services officers;