In which countries are more than three languages spoken?

picture

a. Uzbekistan and Tajikistan
b. Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan
c. Uzbekistan and Afghanistan
d. Afghanistan and Turkmenistan

The correct answer is C. Uzbekistan and Afghanistan.

Explanation

The image is a map showing the languages spoken in, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, and Afghanistan. Additionally, this image has a box in which each language is associated with a graphic pattern or a color, for example, Kazakh, is associated with white color. So on the map of Uzbekistan, four colors or graphic patterns are shown that correspond to the languages Kazakh (white), Turkmen (sticks), Uzbek (dots), and another (gray). On the other hand, the map of Afghanistan shows four colors or graphic patterns that correspond to Tajik (squares), other (gray), Uzbek (dots), Kyrgyz (sloping lines) and Pashto (light gray). Also, it is necessary to say that in the other countries no more than two languages are shown in each one. According to the image, it can be stated that the countries where more than three languages are spoken are Uzbekistan and Afghanistan, so the correct answer is C.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

president reagan was a good presidant and should be presidant if he was still alive

explanation: