Social Studies, 05.05.2020 09:09, angellll4455
Miranda v. Arizona (1966), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court. The Court ruled that a suspect in police custody must be informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. They must be informed of the right against self-incrimination and the right to remain silent. This is protected by the 5th amendment? True or False?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30, Michael321
Lance, a hacker, stole 15,000 credit card numbers and sold them on the black mar-ket, making millions. police caught lance, and two legal actions followed, one civil and one criminal. who will be responsible for bringing the civil case? what will be the outcome if the jury believes that lance was responsible for identity thefts? who will be responsible for bringing the criminal case? what will be the outcome if the jury believes that lance stole the numbers?
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00, loudermilkb117
Congress is controlled by the democrats. president yaeger, a republican, takes several actions that are opposed by the democrats in congress. first, the president introduces a new budget that cuts most of the government's social programs and gives tax breaks to the wealthy. next, president yaeger negotiates a trade treaty with a nation accused of human rights abuses. then, the president gives pardons to three republican senators who have been convicted of crimes.
Answers: 3
Miranda v. Arizona (1966), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court. The Court rul...
Chemistry, 23.10.2020 15:50
Social Studies, 23.10.2020 15:50