Most Americans in the 1930s and 1940s did not know that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was severely handicapped from polio and had to use a wheelchair, just as many in the 1960s did not know that John F. Kennedy had extramarital affairs while in the White House. Journalists at the time censored themselves due to respect for the office and the man. Which is better: not knowing very much or knowing a lot about the personal lives of presidents? Does what happens in a politician's life affect his or her ability to govern? Have our most effective presidents also been the most exemplary? Explain.

ANSWER:

What happens in a politician life has not really been a reason for a successful or unsuccessful leadership. Because everyone has life challenges, it only takes a bold and strong person to keep it's challenge aside and focus on it's leadership duties when it comes to official duties. And I believe that for any man to win the presidential election, such person must have been a strong and bold man. Because the challenges of winning the election should have sharpen the president.

Using Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy as a case study. This two president are seen as one of the figures that made America popular during their presidential era. Franklin is rated as the best president after Abraham Lincoln, due to his achievement in office. He was the president that helped to stop the word war II. He was the president that helped America during the great depression. He achieved many things for America, even with his life challenges. John F. Kennedy is one of the outstanding president, that is a figure in the U.S politics of today. He is very popular with his civil right act and Revenue act which was enacted by the chambers after his assassination.

Everyman has a life challenging issue and his privacy to such issue should be respected by everyone. It is not the right of the citizens to know the personal issues of the president. It will only be their right to know this, if the president has failed to be in his official duties due to his life issues. That means an explanation should be given to it's citizens, about his absence on official duties.

The most effective president in the U.S so far is Abraham Lincoln. If we check the life of this man, we will see that he also have life challenges that was never known by the citizens, until his death. Lincoln has never told any press his personal life challenges, as he always keep it private to himself.

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great

chronological thinking is an indispensable tool to structure a historical narrative and to give meaning to a sequence of events. the final section presents the results of a survey to test the chronological thinking of lower secondary school students carried out by the educational research institute.