Social Studies
Social Studies, 26.08.2019 20:00, madelineb6243

How is an appeals court different then a traditional federal court?
a) there are three justices in an appeals court.
b) there are no options after the appeals court.
c) there are three justices in a traditional federal court.
d) there are more chances to be heard at an appeals court.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50, adjjones2011
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30, ldelgado97
What attorney successfully defended zenger during trail
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40, needhelp9627
Asociologist wants to study a culture that occurs in some women’s prisons: “state families,” in which individual prisoners take on certain roles within a group of like-minded prisoners. there is previous evidence that younger prisoners will use older inmates who play the roles of grandparents as a resource before they will turn to staff for and advice. the lieutenant in charge of a dorm of long-term prisoners offers to gather volunteers to speak to the researcher and also offers to vouch for the integrity of the researcher. the use of this staff is: a valid use of a statistical technique referred to “snowball sampling” wherein the inclusion of the first subject leads to the recruitment of another one subject. a useful tactic in obtaining a sample of prisoners who both meet the criteria and who will be honest with the researcher. wrong and is prohibited; subject selection needs to be free from intervention by prison authorities or prisoners. acceptable only when the researcher’s irb grants a special waiver.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30, autumn452392
In exchange for land, a knight agrees to be a sort of sub-vassal to a vassal. this agreement was known as: investiture homage tyranny subinfeudation
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
How is an appeals court different then a traditional federal court?
a) there are three justic...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 18.09.2019 05:50