The Supreme Court is commonly thought to be "above politics". However, one can argue that the appointment of Supreme Court justices is political.
(a) Identify three characteristics of Supreme Court nominees and discuss how each characteristic has been politically relevant during the appointment process.
(b) Identify two methods that have been used by interest groups to influence the appointment process. Explain how each of these methods has been used to influence that process.

Refer below.

Explanation:

Three characteristics of Supreme Court nominees:

1. Ideology (Party) - The individual political convictions of a potential individual from the Supreme Court are politically significant during the arrangement procedure on the grounds that the ideological group of an individual can impact the choices they make in court.

2. Qualifications/Education in Law - This can guarantee the nominee is qualified in comprehension of the Constitution and laws to help make an informed supposition looking into it.

3. Race - if the arrangement can be believed to authorize racial decent variety among the judges the person in question might be bound to get affirmed

Identify two methods that have been used by interest groups:

1. Interest groups can impact the arrangement procedure by endeavoring to mutilate a candidate that the gathering loathes. (Campaigning to congress since Senate has the last affirmation of a presidential arrangement)

2. Advertising - this can carry out significant issues well known with the individuals and base that on who to name as an equity. (Cause a chosen one to appear to be progressively positive) - Example - Major issue is fetus removal and is featured by the media, a candidate may be picked with solid restriction or side interest towards premature birth

answer; exaggerate what you believe is the deception and state it, hoping that the other will jump in to "correct" the statement;