In classical conditioning, the conditioned stimulus naturally triggers a response. is a naturally occurring response. is initially neutral, and then comes to trigger a response. prompts spontaneous recovery. is a reward offered for completing a behavior.

Is initially neutral, and then comes to trigger a response.

Explanation:

In classical conditioning the conditioned stimulus is a previously neutral stimulus which gradually comes to cause a conditioned response after being associated with the unconditioned stimulus. Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which a conditioned stimulus is combined with an unrelated unconditioned stimulus to elicit a behavioral response known as a conditioned response. A response occurs with more regularity in a well-specified, stable environment. One of the key components of conditioning is a conditioned environment.

The correct answer is: Is initially neutral, and then comes to trigger a response.

Explanation:

Classical conditioning occurs when a previously neutral stimulus is consistently paired with an unconditioned stimulus that triggers an unconditioned response till the point where the previously neutral stimulus transforms itself into a conditioned stimulus.

For example:

Previously neutral stimulus: sound of a bell

UC stimulus: Food

UR: Salivate

If the food gets associated with the sound of the bell, by only hearing the bell without the presence of food, a dog would salivate. (CS-CR).

answer; /// i do believe that the correct answer is (d) majority vote as an approval requirement;

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.