Melissa is employed by Conway Chemical Corporation. The company allows the employees to use the conference room for club meetings, like the knitting club and book club. Melissa has asked to use the conference room for prayer meetings on Wednesday mornings before her shift starts. Melissa's request was denied. A. Melissa does not have a claim for religious discrimination because the other activities were purely secular in nature. B. Melissa does not have a claim for religious discrimination because she failed to inform her employer of her religious belief. C. Melissa has a cause of action for religious discrimination because she is being treated differently based on religion. D. Melissa has a cause of action for religious discrimination because the RFRA states that it is religious discrimination for employers to allow employees to engage in secular activities and refuse to allow employees to engage in religious activities.

A. Melissa does not have a claim for religious discrimination because the other activities were purely secular in nature.

Explanation:

In most association out there, there has been a raging issue on allowing religious activities among there employee in the work environment. Almost all company rejects the idea of religious activities being promoted within the organization inorder to prevent crises among people who share different religions.

In the case of Melissa, she has no claim for religious discrimination as a result of the activities which the conference room is going to be used specifically mentioned. It shows that , it was secular activies that was encouraged which has no binding efffect on the religion proclaimed by the employees.

abolish

do away with

unanimous

in complete agreement

secede

separate; break free

inauguration

starting a new position with a formal ceremony.

cooperationist

people who wanted the north to cooperate with the south

surrender

to give up

volunteer

perform a service for free

draft

involuntary service in military

retreat

withdraw; move away from enemy

advisor

expert who gives advice

explanation:

no questions on whether they are allowed that right