Lawanda just didn't want to change her stance on capital punishment, but Jack's argument did make her think twice about her position. However, instead of being persuaded, Lawanda dismissed the arguments by deeming Jack's facts unreliable. How has Lawanda responded to her own cognitive dissonance in this instance:
A. By reinterpreting Jack's message.
B. By attacking the credibility of Jack's sources.
C. By simply refusing to listen to the remaining points.
D. By seeking information from another source.

B.By attacking the credibility of Jack's sources.

Explanation:

Cognitive dissonance is a psychological term that refers to a situation which involves conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors.

This then gives rise to a feeling of mental discomfort leading to a change in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to alleviate the discomfort and restore balance.

Lawanda responded to her own cognitive dissonance in this instance by attacking the credibility of Jack's sources.

i need more info !

answer; ethnocentric;