In the Scott v. Sandford case, why was the argument of Sandford’s widow based on the Fifth Amendment?
A. She believed that the Missouri courts had been unfair.
B. She believed that Scott had been born in a slave state.
C. She believed that Scott was trying to steal from her.
D. She believed that Scott was her late husband’s property.

hey there the answer is D: she believed that Scott was her late husbands property

Explanation: i just took the test and got it right your welcome

The answer is... D=She believed that Scott was her late husband’s property.

Explanation: She believed that Scott was her late husband's property. ... Sandford ruling? Many people were angry at the decision and thought it meant slavery would spread.

no

explanation:

the most likely outcome of fewer loon territories is that hawks would increase in proportion because the benefit of victory would be greater. hawks and loons are natural rivals of resources and victories in the game, since the lakes drying up affected the loons, the hawks would be benefited from the drought.