When the decision about where to eat is in question, Jakob usually defers to Phil. On the other hand, when it comes to which movie to see, Jakob usually makes the decision. Jakob and Phil's friendship seems to generally work this way, with Jakob being the expert and in charge of some things, and Phil in others. How would this friendship best be classified in terms of power?

The friendship can be classified as equal importance in terms of power.

Explanation:

In this context there are two friends one is Jakob and another is Phil . Both the friends make decision accordingly that is at the time of selection of food Phil makes the decision and on the other hand Jakob takes the decision at the time of selection of movies. Hence we can say that according to power both are getting equal importance and hence it is making their friendship very strong. In case of friendship proper understanding of the mentality is always required. One must not feel inferior when it comes to friendship.

i go with [ a

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.