Social Studies, 09.04.2020 21:49, pahalsehgal

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and began to
annex Cherokee land. How did the Court rule?
A. Only the federal government had the authority to deal with the Cherokees and the Georgia laws dealing
with them were unconstitutional.
B. The Georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional
The federal government and the state of Georgia both had the authority to deal with the Cherokees.
D. The state of Georgia did not have the authority to deal with the Cherokees; the true authority belonged to
the state of Alabama.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:30, gooberthebear8955

An economic system where all or most businesses are owned by government

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:10, DESIRE44030

Which statement best completes the diagram of the ways the different branches of government can limit each other's powers?

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00, alisonlebron15

11. why do citizens have to register to vote?

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:40, perezsamantha3oqr0za

Donald is studying the eating habits of all students attending his school. he samples the population by dividing the students into groups by grade level and randomly selecting a proportionate number of students from each group. he then collects data from the sample. which type of sampling is used? select the correct answer below: systematic sampling convenience sampling stratified sampling cluster sampling

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its bord...