Social Studies

American government pls help

Read the following excerpt from the text describing First Amendment rights.
The Constitution protects the right of the people to assemble to express their views. It protects their right to organize to influence public policy, whether in political parties, interest groups, or other organizations. It also protects the people’s right to petition—to bring their views to the attention of public officials by such varied means as written petitions, letters, or advertisements; lobbying; and parades or marches.
Which of these actions would be an unconstitutional violation of rights?
A. The police arrest a group of civil rights activists who have committed an act of civil disobedience.
B. The local authorities refuse to issue a parade permit to a group who wants to march past a school during school hours.
C. The police arrest a man for giving a speech that urges the violent overthrow of the government.
D. The authorities refuse to give a demonstration permit to a group that wants to hold a rally promoting racist beliefs.

Question 3 of 32
How has the Supreme Court reshaped its interpretation of the Second Amendment?
A. It incorporated the Second Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
B. It made it a crime to ship sawed-off shotguns across state lines without a federal license.
C. It upheld prohibitions against the possession of firearms by felons.
D. It protected the rights of each state to keep a militia.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:20, gokusupersaiyan12345
A(n) is an alliance or collection of parties.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00, xoaprilox
What important race leader of the early twentieth century is being described?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:00, jagger68
The “redeemers” in the last-19th century south would have been most likely to support?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
American government pls help

Read the following excerpt from the text describing First A...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Social Studies, 02.08.2019 04:40