EXPLAIN 4 REASONS WHY COUNTRIES STRIVE HARD TO ACQUIRE THE STATUS OF A NATION-STATE

The four reasons behind the strive or hardness to acquire the status of a nation state: 1. Lack of reconciliation. 2. Lack of proper response 3. Problem in proper infrastructural agenda 4. Over population.

Lack of reconciling nature of a country restrict it from become a nation state.

Due response at due time for constructing a perfect bondage between number of countries are required.

In efficiency in carrying on proper infrastructural agenda makes a country lagging behind.

Over population is another alarming fact that creates unnecessary burden on land.

Explanation:

There are number of reasons behind the unsuccessful condition of a country to be a perfect nation state. To be nation state country needs to follow some sorts of norms like they need to follow proper reconciling nature with other countries so that there must be a adjustment and understanding persists.

Proper infrastructural facilities are needed. Overpopulation growth should be avoided to give a country a form of ideal nation state. Perfect response in due time for agendas and meeting, activeness is required from the end of the countries.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: