Which of the following descriptions of environmental adaptation strategies is most similar to those practiced by the early Anasazi people?
A. A leader collects all crops gathered by his people and distributes them equally among the population.

B. A farmer digs an irrigation ditch to direct river water toward a desert in hopes of transforming it into farmland.

C. A father spends a majority of his time hunting for large game while his wife tends to a small personal garden.

D. A family lives near a wooded area in order to live in harmony with nature and prevent others from exploiting it.

"A farmer digs an irrigation ditch to direct river water toward a desert in hopes of transforming it into farmland" descriptions of environmental adaptation strategies is most similar to those practiced by the early Anasazi people.

Option: B

Explanation:

Anasazi represents the ancient external. Similarly as other cultures throughout the agricultural period, in areas with low rainfall, the Anasazi engaged a large number of techniques to develop great yield crops. Kivas, the great stone reservoirs, was utilized by the Anasazi to preserve domestic and farming water.

Check dams and stone terraces have been used to avoid erosion and permit good agriculture with minimal irrigation or rainfall. Their baskets and ceramics are widely valued by collectors, and are still being generated for exchange by their offspring. However, it's their cliff dwellings that fascinate modern archaeologists, historians, and visitors.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: