Social Studies
Social Studies, 30.03.2020 15:55, navarretteisaiah09

Public figures:
a. must establish malice in order to recover damages for defamation.
b. can seek a retraction, but can never recover damages for defamation.
c. lose their defamation action rights if the remark or information is part of a story.
d. can never have an action in defamation.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00, nauticatyson9
•favored a limited national government • opposed a national bank • was supported primarily by farmers, artisans and skilled workers the box above best describes which political party that was formed in the united states in the 1790s? a. democratic-republican b. whig c. populist d. federalist
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:20, melinasilerox9mjh
If you wish to make an explicit comparison of two dissimilar things without using like or as you would use the
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 16:30, brainy51
What are foods that netherlands people eat
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Public figures:
a. must establish malice in order to recover damages for defamation.
b...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 04.08.2019 11:30