Which of the following is a benefit of winning a defamation lawsuit against an unknown party, or "John Doe"?

a. The win may allow the plaintiff to use the authority of the courts to obtain from Internet service providers (ISPs) the identity of the persons responsible for the defamation.
b. The government has to pay damages to plaintiffs in cases where the true identity of the defendant is unknown.
c. The Internet service provider (ISP) has to pay damages to plaintiffs in cases where the true identity of the defendant is unknown.
d. In 1986, a real person named John Doe established a bank account with donated funds for cases where the true identity of a defendant is unknown. The plaintiff may be able to receive damages from this account.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.