Rosalee and Marlen, both vegans who abstain from all animal products, are working on a public service announcement (PSA) to change public attitudes towards vegans. Rosalee argues that if people knew how good veganism is for their own health and for the health of the environment, they would develop more positive attitudes towards veganism. Marlen argues that people tend to view vegans as extremists and that having a prominent vegan (e. g., skier Heather Mills) advocate veganism will be more effective. Who is right?

If the intended audience doesn't really care about veganism one way or another, Marlen is right.

Explanation:

Marlen is right. Having a prominent vegan (e.g., skier Heather Mills) advocate veganism will be more effective because since she's prominent, people will see how good veganism is to their health and environment through her and would appreciate veganism. Hence, develop more positive attitude towards veganism.

If the intended audience doesn't really care about veganism one way or another, Marlen is right.

Explanation:

Marlen is right because their is probability or tendency that the intended audience in which they are trying to publicized the important of Vegans to may not even care about it and as well as its important or what benefit will be derived from it this may be due to the fact that the audience are already use to abstaining from the use of the animal products, particularly in their diet either for ethical,health or due to environmental reasons which is best known to them.

The intended audience may wish not to know how important vagen is to them and their environment because some people tend to view vegans as extremists which may be one of the reason they dont care or even showed interest it.

Therefore according to Marlen having a prominent vegan (e.g., skier Heather Mills) advocate veganism will be more effective and may change people views about it

51% were unhappy, i think .   ; )

i r r e l e v a n t