11) Lauren wants to open a floral shop in a downtown business district. She doesn't have funds enough to purchase inventory and pay six months' rent up front. Lauren approaches a good friend, Jamie, to discuss the possibility of Jamie investing funds and becoming a 25% partner in the business. After a lengthy discussion, Jamie agrees to invest. Eight months later, Jamie discovered that Lauren has not be honest with her regarding some aspects of the business financial operation. In order for Jamie to sue Lauren for fraud, all the following must be true exceptJamie found Lauren dishonest because she does not always reconcile the business cash account on a timely basis. Jamie found Lauren honest because she does not always reconcile the business cash account on a timely basis.

Bull files a suit against clay in a state court over payment due on a short-term lease of grazing land. the case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. the case is appealed to an appellate court. after its review of bull v. clay, the appellate court upholds the lower court’s verdict. the appellate court has:

How did north carolina’s constitution of 1868 affect women and free blacks? a. they were given the right to vote b. they were excluded from participation in government c. they lost economic power d. they were able to hold office if they owned property

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.