Identify the characteristics of a unitary system and a federal system, and provide examples of each.

A unitary system is one in which power can be granted to or taken back from regions by a decision of central authority without the involvement of the regions themselves while a federal system is one in which there is division of power between a federal government and sub-federal governments(most times state and local governments)

Explanation: characteristics of unitary system include:

1. central government has sovereignty over what happens at every sub-level

2. sub level competencies are defined by statute and not enshrined in the written constitution

3. There is no direct participation of sub-levels in constitutional amendments

Characteristics of federal system include:

1. federal laws supercede state laws

2. federal laws must be applied by state courts

3.federal powers are limited and state powers are protected by the constitution

4. There's representation of states in parliament and states actively participate in constitutional amendments

Example of governments practising unitary system is the United Kingdom, Norway, Romania and Israel while federal system is practised in the United States, Canada, Germany and Australia.

well its is frequent rain

have a good day

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.