Alex files a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 7. He owes $2.37 million to assorted creditors. Two months before filing, he sold his beach house, which was valued at $600,000, to his brother Jonah for $150,000. If the trustee objects to the sale, then it is most likely that:

The trustee can stop Alex from selling the house and that automatically prevent the transfer of ownership from Alex to his brother Jonah.

Explanation:

The trustee will refute the transfer and take back the house as part of Alex's estate. The reason for this is not far fetched, Alex actions in this regards is tantamount to an abuse of chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy law. In that case, the trustees can use the "means test" to determine his actions and can stop the transfer of ownership to his brother, Jonah.

Because of people like Alex, US trustees has achieved a regulatory system most creditor friendly commentators have consistently espoused, which is a formal means test for Chapter 7. (The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) has clarified this area of concern.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: