If the government allowed a free market for transplant organs such as kidneys to exist, the a. shortage of organs would be eliminated, and there would be no surplus of organs. b. shortage of organs would persist. c. overall well-being of society would remain unchanged. d. shortage of organs would be eliminated, but a surplus of organs would develop.

d. shortage may be eliminated

Explanation:

These days there are over one hundred thousand persons waiting for a new kidney. In addition to that there are recipients waiting five to ten years for a new organ.  If the government were to open a free market on an organ such as this is will end up being counter productive unless there are established guidelines present. Firstly, there will be no more shortage of organs but this will come from persons that would donate for money or from those that are forcibly coerced to remove their organ. Society may not remain unchanged since the already existing kidnapping for organ harvest trade could be more rampant. Lastly, this idea with proper guidelines could seem feasible but it is not worth public safety on a whole.

aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, theocracy and tyranny

explanation:

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.