Those who take classes designed to improve their scores on standardized tests, such as the sat, seem to enjoy improved scores when they take the test after the course. it would be easy to assume that the course was responsible for the improvement, but this would be ignoring which principle of critical thinking?
a. extraordinary claimsb. ruling out rival hypotheses
c. falsifiabilityd. correlation vs. causation

Option C

Explanation:

Falsifiability is a type of critical thinking principle that is established when the factors that will make an event false able is in existence , that is when we can render the event false. But relating to the fact established above, the students that per take in the course to improve SAT scores us evident as relating to the question so it is true and can't be false so the above question neglects the falsifiability principle because the fact stated above is true and evident as it is seen that truly if anyone takes the course, there SAT scores is improved

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.

i think you really need to revive you answer! : d