The judicial test that places the burden of proof on government to show that a race-based policy serves a "compelling interest," is "narrowly tailored," and uses the "least restrictive means" for achieving its compelling interest is called:

STRICT SCRUTINY

Explanation:

Strict scrutiny is the highest form of judicial review process through which judge requests the government to provide a proof for a certain matter or issue.

STRICT SCRUTINY IS SPECIFICALLY ADOPTED OR APPLIED BY JUDGES WHEN A CASE CONCERNING THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OR A CASE INVOLVING GOVERNMENT ACTION IS NEEDED IN ORDER TO CLASSIFY A SUSPECT BASED ON RACE OR NATIONALITY.

ANSWER: STRICT SCRUTINY

EXPLANATION: STRICT SCRUTINY is the tool used in the United States of America to incorporate standard judicial review.

However, the aftermath of this review may occur as striking down a law by the judge unless the government show proof or demonstrate in court that a law or regulation have this three points.

A. serves a "compelling state interest";

B. is "narrowly tailored" to achieving this compelling purpose;

C. uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.

Conclusively, this review represent a degree of standards that courts established to determine a constitutional right or principle, and government's interest in regards to the principle observance.

the aksumite empire was an ancient kingdom located in what is now northern ethiopia from the period of 100 ad to 940 ad. its capital was the city of aksum. the kingdom established itself as one of the 4 great powers at its time, along with persia, rome, and china.

the kingdom was rich in goods like gold, iron, and salt. it established strong commercial ties with the regions governed by rome, egypt, and persia (arabia). aksum was a key location in this commercial network. trade was also facilitated with the introduction of the aksumite currency.

explanation:

may i ask what challenges?