1. Which of these examples reflects how the African union similar to the European Union in the United Nations?
A. A cooperative, international military instead of an organized military force.
B. Judicial system to enforce international laws
C. Common currency
D. Common language

2. Arab league consists of all nations in the Middle East that are of islamic faith?
A. True
B. False

3. When were many of the borders of African countries drawn?
A. In 1988 after 13 presidential assassinations happened in Africa.
B. Add the World Cup.
C. During the Libyan independence movement in 1951.
D. During European colonialism.

4. The middle east is a geographic region entirely on the continent of Africa?
A. True
B. False

5. The past hundred years in the Middle East have been peaceful
A. True
B. False

1. A cooperative, international military instead of an organized military force.

Explanation:

The African Union is a new organization. Its objectives are very similar to those of the European Union, just for the African countries of course. It is an organization that is supposed to bring in all African countries together, to collaborate, help each other, trade freely, and protect each other.

One big similarity with the European Union is that the African Union has a cooperative, international military instead of an organized military force. While this is a good idea when it comes to protecting the sovereignty of the countries and the people, in practice the forces of the African Union, as well as its predecessor organization, have turned to be highly inefficient, and they will need lot of improvement.

2. False.

Explanation:

The Arab League is an organization that has its goals mainly on economic and military support between its member states. As the name suggests, the Arab League is consisted of Arab countries, which are also all Muslim countries.

This doesn't mean that all Muslim countries in the region are members of the Arab League though. Iran is an example of a country that is not a member state. The reason as to why Iran is not a member state is because of the traditional rivalry, religious tensions between the Shiite and Shia Muslims, as well as the different political ideologies.

3. During European colonialism

Explanation:

The African states mostly have superimposed borders. These are types of borders where the people of those countries had no say in it, but instead it was foreign powers that made the decision. This has made huge problems in the African countries and still is.

The majority of the borders that we see nowadays were actually made during the European colonization. Basically, the Europeans had divided the continent into territories controlled by them, and when the time came for the African countries to gain independence, the Europeans just made official the colonial borders for most countries.

4. False

Explanation:

The Middle East is a region that is defined differently by different sources, but in no case it is a region that is entirely on the African continent. The region is known for multiple things, such as being the cradle of civilization, cradle of the three Abrahamic religions, being constantly in war, possessing one of the largest reserves of oil and gas, and being predominantly Muslim.

As I said, the region is defined differently by different sources. The core of the region in every case is the Arabian Peninsula, together with the Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Syria, and Israel. In some cases though, Afghanistan is included as part of the region, while in some cases Egypt is included. Rarely, even Turkey and Libya are put into this region.

5. False

Explanation:

In the past one hundred years, the Middle East has been anything but peaceful. In fact, the region has constantly been in conflict, and the reasons for that have been numerous. Also, the fact that the Middle East is of great interest for all of the developed and powerful counties and they mingle into the region, doesn't help at all in its stabilizing.

Initially the conflicts were in order to become free from the Ottoman Empire and later from the colonists. After that though, started conflicts on religious basis, between the Muslims and the Jews, and between the Shia and Shiite Muslims. The conflicts have also continued in order to get more resources, mainly gas and oil. And last but not least, the formation of powerful terrorist organizations with lot of support, also created large scale conflicts in order to achieve their ideals to create a caliphate.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.