The ideas of the non-exclusion and shared consumption are at the heart of the economic system. When people can obtain a good or service whether they pay for it or not they have less incentive to pay. If consumers have no incentive to pay the costs, producers will have little incentive to provide the benefits. As a result, such goods and services will not be produced despite the fact that everyone wants them. The passage above explain why the government

provides public goods and services.

Explanation: The passage above explains why government provides public goods and services. If the government provides these goods and services, the goods and services everyone wants would still be produced whether some people have incentive to pay for the goods and services or not, while if the provisions are left with the private individuals alone, if consumers have no incentive to pay, then it will result to the discontinuous produce of that commodity or services despite the fact there are people who can pay for the incentives.

if you tell me the video, i may be able to answer your question.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.