The idea that courts should not be heavily involved in lawmaking, but rather should only rule in cases where the constitutionality is clear is known as a. judicial restraint. b. judicial activism. c. judicial reform. d. judicial review.

Use your answers to the questions above to write a judicial opinion for each case using this template. explain your answers to each question in detail and use information from the lesson and the court's minority and majority opinions. be sure to check your work for proper spelling and grammar. reflect on your decisions in the cases of hazelwood v. kuhlmeier and t. m. v. state of florida using the following questions: did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case? did you tend to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights for each case? what factors most influenced your decision and interpretations in each case? use your answers to the questions above to write a judicial opinion for each case using this template. explain your answers to each question in detail and use information from the lesson and the court's minority and majority opinions. be sure to check your work for proper spelling and grammar.