A student who was denied admission to law school brought suit against the school. While the case was ongoing, the student was provisionally admitted. By the time the Court was about to issue its decision, the student was going to graduate soon. The case, DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), was dismissed because the Court determined the outcome of the case would not affect the student. The Court dismissed the case as Group of answer choices statutory law. lacking standing. judicial activism. moot.

Moot

Explanation:

The reason is that the moot cases are the cases that are filed to fight for the rights are not recognizable by law and are open to discussions. In the case of  DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), the student has filed a petition for defending his right which was not recognized by the law and as a result the court debated for a long time (It was a moot case) and at last the court dismissed the case because the student was near the graduation. And also that the outcome of the case wouldn't affect the student because the right for which he was fighting was not at risk anymore.

usually, however, secession was popular enough without the of community leaders. prominent unionists, on the other hand, were a major reason that texas did not secede before march 1861. the most important of these was sam houston, the governor of the state from 1859 to 1861.

can i have brainlest