Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, KittyLitty
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:20, kaylag8242p2qj2e
In the south during the industrial revolution,
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 24.06.2019 01:00, josephicarusmarrujo
Which action is most likely to be taken by a local political party rather than a state or national party?
Answers: 3
Why are economic indicators important...
Social Studies, 29.01.2020 03:42