A multiple-regression analysis is run to examine third variables as a follow-up to the study indicating that boys with unusual names are more likely to commit crimes. Unusual names, ethnic backgrounds, and geographical regions are all included as predictor variables. Even after controlling for all of these variables, unusual names still predict criminal activity. Why doesn't this study establish causation?
a. Temporal precedence isn't established
b. The beta values are not shown, so there isn't enough information to conclude causation
c. There may be some other third variable
d. No cross-lag correlation was done

c. There may be some other third variable

Explanation:

A multiple-regression analysis is run to examine third variables as a follow-up to the study indicating that boys with unusual names are more likely to commit crimes. Unusual names, ethnic backgrounds, and geographical regions are all included as predictor variables. Even after controlling for all of these variables, unusual names still predict criminal activity. This study  doesnot establish causation as there may be some other third variable and this variable also known as the confounding variables. During research its in not possible to be controlled by the researchers.The third variable also affect on the dependent as well as independent variable.

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.

this question your asking is true hope this and you get a 100 percent : )