Would a strong labor party promote the general welfare of the people of this country? No; a strong labor party would make it unattractive for private investors to risk their money in business ventures, thus causing sustained large-scale unemployment. Argument strong Argument weak

Argument strong.

Explanation:

I believe the argument is strong for three reasons: the premises are true, the information is relevant, and the argument is logic. It is true that labor parties tend to fight for the interests of the working class in detriment of the interests of wealthy business owners. That does indeed lead to a decline in ventures and fewer job opportunities on the part of the latter. That information is important when we think of the welfare of the people, since economic growth and employment are essential. The connection of those facts to form an argument is valid and logic. Therefore, we can safely say this is a strong argument.

aren't cheetos good enough to be president?

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.